Permalink for Comment #1313017124 by michaelnelson

, comment by michaelnelson
michaelnelson I think you tend to give Phish 2.0 too much credit. Here's what their history boils down to for me: 1) there's Phish (until the hiatus and since the breakup) and 2) there was that sucky Phish-wannabe band with their short shows, endless guitar-loop-space-"jams" and repetitive setlists (known as 2.0).

The REAL Phish is BACK... enjoy it, they are at the top of their game.
Score: 1    
Phish.net Login
Secure Login
Register | Forgot Password
Support Phish.net & Mbird
Make a Donation
Phish.net is a project of the non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
Recent Blog Posts
Sphere4 Recap: A Spherical Experience 2024-04-22
Sphere3 Recap: Squaring the Sphere 2024-04-21
Sphere2 Recap: ISO 2 Saturdays 2024-04-20
Sphere1 Recap 2024-04-19
Phish Studies Conference Unveils 2024 Agenda, Sphere PhanArt Event 2024-04-17
Attendance Bias Podcast Revisits Phil Lesh And Phriends At The Warfield, April 15-16-17, 1999 2024-04-15
Surrender To The Flow #82: Las Vegas 2024 2024-04-12
PhishNet Was Born June 22, 1991 2024-03-18
Divided Sky Foundation Announces 2024 Fun(d) Run and Music Fest 2024-03-12
This Time Will Be Different: Attendance Bias Podcast Celebrates 15 Years Since Hampton 2009 2024-03-01


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode